This is a blog about psychological assessment. However, just for fun, I am posting a short children’s story I wrote a while back.
The text version is here.
Math With Bad Drawings post that is 2 standard deviations above its own ridiculously high mean.
One day in fifth grade, I was playing with numbers, scribbling down products and quotients—you know, typical cool-kid stuff—when I noticed a pattern. Take any pair of numbers that are two apart (like 6 and 8, or 9 and 11). Multiply them together. Then add one.
You’ll get the square of the number in between them!
This blew my mind. The numbers were hiding secret alliances, passing coded messages amongst themselves, and I’d somehow broken inside. I was a number spy.
View original post 492 more words
Math with Bad Drawings is what happens when Sophia & Psyche Muse about Gauss…and the drawings are amazing.
I recently was reading the book “Functional Art” and came across the work of Stefanie Posavec. Her Sentence Drawings (click here to see and click here to learn) caught my attention. Here is a ggplot2 rendition:
From what I understand about this visualization technique it’s meant to show the aesthetic and organic beauty of language (click here for interview with artist). I was captivated and thus I began the journey of using ggplot2 to recreate a Sentence Drawing.
I decided to use data sets from the qdap package.
Installing Packages from GitHub
Right Turn Function
Stefanie Posavec describes the process for creating the Sentence Drawing by making a right turn at the end of each sentence. I went straight to work creating an inefficient solution to making right hand turns. Realizing the inefficiency, I asked for help and utilized this response from flodel…
View original post 377 more words
This has nothing to do with psychometrics but today I sent this letter to Grammar Girl (Mignon Fogarty):
Hi Grammar Girl,
I love the podcast.
I went back and listened to the episode on “inflammable.” I wish there were a word for words and phrases I am reluctant to use correctly because I do not wish to be misunderstood.
Perhaps because “inflammable” is such a perfect example of this phenomenon, it could be re-purposed to refer to any word or phrase that should be avoided because it frequently misunderstood.
Then I could say, “I never say ‘niggardly” to mean stingy because it is hopelessly inflammable!”
Whether you like my idea or not, if you haven’t already done so, it would be interesting to have a podcast about words and phrases you worry about using for fear of being misunderstood or being unfairly judged as ignorant.
Some words, like “niggardly,” are lost causes. I don’t really need that word because there are excellent alternatives.
However, I really find the phrase “to beg the question” to be useful and I hate having to define it after using it.
I avoid using the word “fantasy” even when I mean something non-sexual.
“Redoubtable” just does not sound like it means what it means. I fear that people will think I mean something like “capable of causing repeated misgivings.”
“Decadent” is nowadays almost exclusively associated with chocolate.
I’ve never hear the word “livid” other than to refer to the discoloration of person’s face when the person is very angry. I would be reluctant to use it for any other purpose.
There are many useful meanings of “romantic” but too many people think I am referring to love.
Thanks for producing so many lively and engaging podcasts about grammar, writing, and language.